Thursday, November 1, 2012

Vancomycin versus linezolid in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus meningitis in an experimental rabbit model.


Vancomycin versus linezolid in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus meningitis in an experimental rabbit model.


Oct 2012

Source

Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Urla State Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

Abstract


Background: The aim of this study was to compare the antibacterial efficacy of vancomycin and linezolid in a rabbit model ofmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) meningitis. 

Material/Methods: Meningitis was induced by intracisternal inoculation of ATCC 43300 strain. After 16 h incubation time and development of meningitis, the vancomycin group received vancomycin 20 mg/kg every 12 h. The linezolid-10 and linezolid-20 groups received linezolid in 10 and 20 mg/kg dosages every 12 h, respectively. The control group did not receive any antibiotics. Cerebrospinal fluid bacterial counts were measured at the end of 16-h incubation time and at the end of 24-h treatment. 

Results: Bacterial counts were similar in all groups at 16 h. At the end of treatment the decrease in bacterial counts in the vancomycin group was approximately 2 logs higher than the linezolid-20 group (p>0.05) and approximately 4 logs higher than in the linezolid-10 group (p: 0.037) (Vancomycin group: -2.860±4.495 versus Linezolid-20: -0.724±4.360, versus Linezolid-10: 1.39±3.37). Full or partial bacteriological response was higher in vancomycin versus linezolid-10 (p: 0.01), but not vancomycin versus linezolid-20 or linezolid-10 versus-linezolid-20 groups. 

Conclusions: Our results suggest that linezolid is not statistically inferior to vancomycin in the treatment of MRSAmeningitis in an experimental rabbit model in 20 mg/kg q12 h dosage; however, it is inferior in 10 mg/kg q12 h dosage. Additional data should gathered to confirm these findings in advance of clinical trials to assess efficacy in humans.

Friday, October 26, 2012

Design, expression, and characterization of a novel targeted plectasin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.


Design, expression, and characterization of a novel targeted plectasin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.


Oct 2012

Source

Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing, 100081, China.

Abstract


A novel specifically targeted antimicrobial peptide (STAMP) that was especially effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was designed by fusing the AgrD1 pheromone to the N-terminal end of plectasin. This STAMP was named Agplectasin, and its gene was synthesized and expressed in Pichia pastoris X-33 via pPICZαA. The highest amount of total secreted protein reached 1,285.5 mg/l at 108 h during the 120-h induction. The recombinant Agplectasin (rAgP) was purified by cation exchange chromatography and hydrophobic exchange chromatography; its yield reached 150 mg/l with 94 % purity. The rAgP exhibited strong bactericidal activity against S. aureus but not Staphylococcusepidermidis or other types of tested bacteria. A bactericidal kinetics assay showed that the rAgP killed over 99.9 % of tested S. aureus (ATCC 25923 and ATCC 43300) in both Mueller-Hinton medium and human blood within 10 h when treated with 4× minimal inhibitory concentration. The rAgP caused only approximately 1 % hemolysis of human blood cells, even when the concentration reached 512 μg/ml, making it potentially feasible as a clinical injection agent. In addition, it maintained a high activity over a wide range of pH values (2.0-10.0) and demonstrated a high thermal stability at 100 °C for 1 h. These results suggested that this STAMP has the potential to eliminate MRSA strains without disrupting the normal flora.

Nursing home characteristics associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Burden and Transmission.


Nursing home characteristics associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Burden and Transmission.


Oct 2012

Abstract


BACKGROUND: MRSA prevalence in nursing homes often exceeds that in hospitals, but reasons for this are not well understood. We sought to measure MRSA burden in a large number of nursing homes and identify facility characteristics associated with high MRSA burden.

METHODS:

We performed nasal swabs of residents from 26 nursing homes to measure MRSA importation and point prevalence, and estimate transmission. Using nursing home administrative data, we identified facility characteristics associated with MRSA point prevalence and estimated transmission risk in multivariate models.

RESULTS:

We obtained 1,649 admission and 2,111 point prevalence swabs. Mean MRSA point prevalence was 24%, significantly higher than mean MRSA admission prevalence, 16%, with a mean estimated MRSAtransmission risk of 16%.In multivariate models, higher MRSA point prevalence was associated with higher admission prevalence and higher proportions of residents with indwelling devices . Higher estimated MRSAtransmission risk was associated with higher proportions of residents with diabetes  and lower levels of social engagement .

CONCLUSIONS:

MRSA importation was a strong predictor of MRSA prevalence, but MRSA burden and transmission were also associated with nursing homes caring for more residents with chronic illnesses or indwelling devices. Frequent social interaction among residents appeared to be protective of MRSA transmission, suggesting that residents healthy enough to engage in group activities do not incur substantial risks of MRSA from social contact. Identifying characteristics of nursing homes at risk for high MRSA burden and transmission may allow facilities to tailor infection control policies and interventions to mitigate MRSA spread.

Hand hygiene, not isolation, reduces MRSA


Hand hygiene, not isolation, reduces MRSA


October 25, 2012 | By 

Proper hand hygiene can reduce methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections by as much as 95 percent, according to Virginia Commonwealth University researchers. In a nine-year study, researchers found horizontal infection-prevention strategies that encourage hand washing to prevent MRSA and other infections that are transmitted via contact could be more effective than the traditional vertical approach of simply isolating MRSA patients. Isolating patients not only causes feelings of anxiety and depression, but also results in fewer visits by providers and increases the chances of bed sores and falls, lead investigator Michael B. Edmond, chair of infectious diseases at the VCU School of Medicine, said in a statement yesterday. "Patient safety is the key benefit to this approach. We found that it not only prevents MRSA, but other infections that are transmitted via contact. It can also save hospitals a lot of money," Edmond said.

Read more:
 Hand hygiene, not isolation, reduces MRSA - FierceHealthcare http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/story/hand-hygiene-not-isolation-reduces-mrsa/2012-10-25#ixzz2APOmHfVR
Subscribe: http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/signup?sourceform=Viral-Tynt-FierceHealthcare-FierceHealthcare


Thursday, October 18, 2012

In vitro activities of antibiotics and antimicrobial cationic peptides alone and in combination against methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.


In vitro activities of antibiotics and antimicrobial cationic peptides alone and in combination against methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.


Oct 2012

Source

Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology Faculty of Pharmacy, Istanbul University, 34116, Beyazit-Istanbul, Turkiye.

Abstract


Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains are most often found in hospital and community-acquired infections. The danger of MRSA infections results from not only the emergence of multi-drug resistance but also the occurrence of strong biofilm forming bacteria. We investigated the in-vitro activities of antibiotics (daptomycin, linezolid, teichoplanine, azithromycin and ciprofloxacin) and antimicrobial cationic peptides (AMPs; indolicidin, CAMA: cecropin (1-7)-melittin A (2-9) amide, and nisin) alone or in combination against MRSA ATCC 43300 biofilms. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum biofilm eradication concentrations (MBEC) were determined by microbroth dilution technique. Antibiotic and AMP combinations were assessed using the chequerboard technique. For MRSA planktonic cells, MICs of antibiotics and AMPs were ranged between 0.125-512 and 8-16 mg/L, and the MBEC values of them were 512-5120 and 640 mg/L, respectively. With a fractional inhibitory concentration of ≤ 0.5 as borderline, synergistic interactions againstMRSA biofilms were frequent with almost all antibiotic-antibiotic and antibiotic-AMP combinations. Against planktonic cells, they generally had an additive effect. No antagonism was observed. All of the antibiotics, AMPs, and their combinations were able to inhibit the attachment of bacteria at the 1/10xMIC and biofilm formation at 1xMIC. Biofilm-associated MRSA was not affected by therapeutically achievable concentrations of antimicrobial agents. Using a combination of antimicrobial agents can provide a synergistic effect, which rapidly enhances anti-biofilm activity and may help prevent or delay the emergence of resistance. AMPs seem to be a good candidate for further investigations in the treatment of MRSA biofilms, alone or in combination with antibiotics.

Impact of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration on clinical outcomes of patients with vancomycin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.


Impact of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration on clinical outcomes of patients with vancomycin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.


Oct 2012

Source

Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), Athens, Greece; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract


Although the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (VMIC) susceptibility breakpoint for Staphylococcus aureus was recently lowered to ≤2mg/L, it is argued that isolates in the higher levels of the susceptible range may bear adverse clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality and treatment failure) of patients with S. aureus infections by 'high-VMIC' (conventionally defined as VMIC >1mg/L but ≤2mg/L) and 'low-VMIC' (VMIC≤1mg/L) isolates were compared by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. The effect of potential confounders was assessed by univariate meta-regression analyses. In total, 33 studies (6210 patients) were included. Most studies were retrospective (28/33), used the Etest (22/33) and referred to meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections (26/33) and bacteraemia (23/33). Irrespective of VMIC testing method, meticillin resistance and site of infection, the high-VMIC group had higher mortality [relative risk (RR)=1.21 (95% confidence interval 1.03-1.43); 4612 patients] and more treatment failures [RR=1.67 (1.26-2.21); 2049 patients] than the low-VMIC group. The results were not affected by the potential confounders and were reproduced in the subset of patients withMRSA infections [mortality, RR=1.19 (1.02-1.40), 2956 patients; treatment failure, RR=1.69 (1.26-2.25), 1793 patients]. In conclusion, infection by vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus with VMIC>1mg/L appears to be associated with higher mortality than VMIC≤1mg/L. Further research is warranted to verify these results and to assess the impact of VMIC on meticillin-susceptible S. aureus infections. Evaluation of alternative antimicrobial agents also appears justified.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus laryngitis.


Methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus laryngitis.


Sept 2012

Source

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS:

Despite the fact that a wide variety of head and neck methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections have been described, only four cases of MRSA laryngitis are reported in the literature. Our clinical experience suggests that this diagnosis is more common and can be more subtle that previously reported. The objective of this study was to identify and describe the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA) laryngitis, highlighting the in-office workup of these patients.

STUDY DESIGN:

Retrospective case series.

METHODS:

All patients with a culture-proven diagnosis of S aureus laryngitis treated within the Emory Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at Emory University between 2007 and 2011. Demographic, diagnostic, and treatment data were retrospectively collected from the patients' hospital records.

RESULTS:

Three patients with culture-proven MRSA laryngitis were identified. Three further cases of MSSA were also identified. Patients ranged in age from 34 to 74 years. All three patients with MRSA were diabetics. All six patients in the study were current or past users of cigarettes. The most common presenting symptoms were vocal roughness, vocal fatigue, and decreased vocal endurance. There were no symptoms of airway or swallowing compromise. The duration of symptoms at the time of initial assessment ranged from 3 months to 5 years, and most patients had undergone numerous previous treatments. Common signs on laryngeal examination included thickened vocal fold epithelium, whitish debris or the appearance of leukoplakia, edema, and crusting. Signs and symptoms were similar in MRSA and MSSA patients. The diagnosis was made in all patients via awake in-office culture of the larynx. All patients were treated with a prolonged course of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (2-4 weeks). Although repeated courses of treatment were required, most patients had an excellent response to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

This is the largest, single, case series of patients with MRSA laryngitis. Our study findings suggest that the diagnosis may be more common than previously recognized, and that the presenting signs and symptoms may be subtle and similar to MSSA. Diagnosis can be made via in-office laryngeal culture. Clinicians must have a high index of suspicion for this diagnosis. Laryngoscope, 2012.